CITI Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Practice Test

Disable ads (and more) with a premium pass for a one time $4.99 payment

Question: 1 / 155

What should reviewers provide in their evaluations of manuscripts?

Only the negative aspects of the manuscript.

Feedback exclusively on the writing style.

The authors' personal backgrounds and credentials.

Identification of both positive and negative aspects, along with suggestions for improvement.

Reviewers play a crucial role in the peer review process by providing a comprehensive evaluation of manuscripts. The correct answer highlights that reviewers should identify both positive and negative aspects of a manuscript. This balanced feedback ensures that authors are aware of the strengths that can be built upon as well as the weaknesses that need to be addressed.

In addition to identifying these aspects, reviewers should also offer constructive suggestions for improvement. This guidance is vital for authors as it helps them refine their work and enhances the quality of the research being published. By including both commendations and critiques along with practical advice, reviewers contribute to the academic community's standards of quality and integrity in research publications.

The other options would not serve the purpose of a constructive review. Focusing solely on negative aspects, writing style, or the authors' backgrounds fails to provide a holistic evaluation that could lead to meaningful improvements in the manuscript.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta
Next

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy